
Showing
up unannounced at a parish forum on the elections in his Northeast
Pennsylvania diocese, the author of one of this campaign-season's
strongest letters from a US hierarch didn't come without
something to say... plural:A presidential election forum at St. John’s Roman Catholic Church on Sunday centered mainly on abortion.
The
argument and audience, however, erupted when Diocese of Scranton Bishop
Joseph F. Martino unexpectedly arrived and vehemently expressed his
distaste for what was said about the church’s stance on voting
for pro-choice candidates and the exclusion of his anti-abortion letter
at the forum, which recommends voting against pro-choice candidates for
moral reasons....
According to the USCCB’s “Faithful Citizenship” statement,
approved by the full body of U.S. bishops in 2007, “a Catholic
cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an
intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent
is to support that position. At the same time, a voter should not use a
candidate’s opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify
indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues
involving human life and dignity.”
Martino, who arrived
while the panelists were stating their viewpoints, took issue with the
USCCB statement, which was handed out to everyone at the meeting, and
also that his letter was not mentioned once at the forum.
“No USCCB document is relevant in this diocese,” said Martino. “The USCCB doesn’t speak for me.”
“The
only relevant document ... is my letter,” he said. “There
is one teacher in this diocese, and these points are not
debatable.”
His letter, published Sept. 30 and circulated
throughout the diocese, states that a candidate’s abortion stance
is a major voting issue that supersedes all other considerations due to
its grave moral consequences.
“Health care, education,
economic security, immigration, and taxes are very important concerns.
Neglect of any one of them has dire consequences as the recent
financial crisis demonstrates. However, the solutions to problems in
these areas do not usually involve a rejection of the sanctity of human
life in the way that abortion does,” the letter says.
“Another argument goes like this: ‘As wrong as abortion is,
I don't think it is the only relevant ‘life’ issue that
should be considered when deciding for whom to vote.’ This
reasoning is sound only if other issues carry the same moral weight as
abortion does, such as in the case of euthanasia and destruction of
embryos for research purposes. ... National Right to Life reports that
48.5 million abortions have been performed since 1973. One would be too
many. No war, no natural disaster, no illness or disability has claimed
so great a price.”
The letter also states that Catholic
public officials who “persist in public support for
abortion” should “not partake in or be admitted to the
sacrament of Holy Communion.”...
“No social issue
has caused the death of 50 million people,” he said, nothing that
he no longer supports the Democratic Party. “This is madness
people.”
Martino also said that he wanted to persuade Father Martin Boylan, of St. John’s, to cancel the forum.
After his comments, most of the audience stood and clapped loudly while some were angry that the bishop usurped the forum.
About
a quarter of the audience left after the bishop’s comments, which
preceded the last half of the forum, a question and answer session with
the panelists.
Martino exited shortly after his comments.
“Bishop
Martino was aware that the forum at St. John ... was being held. He
attended with the intention of listening to the presenters, and how
they might discuss Catholic teaching,” wrote Bill Genello, a
diocese spokesperson, in an e-mail exchange on Monday. “Certain
groups and individuals have used their own erroneous interpretations of
Church documents, particularly the U.S. Bishops’ statement on
Faithful Citizenship, to justify their political positions and to
contradict the Church’s actual teaching on the centrality of
abortion, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research.”
“
... He reminded those in attendance, and by extension all the faithful
of the Diocese of Scranton, that groups such as Catholic United ... and
other like-minded groups and individuals who make statements about
Catholic teaching do not speak with the same authority or authenticity
as their bishop.”
The Scranton prelate was absent
from last November's USCCB meeting in Baltimore which -- in a rare show
of (near-)unanimity -- passed the
Faithful Citizenship statement with 98% approval from the nation's hierarchy.
0 Responses to ""This Is Madness, People": In Surprise Cameo, Scranton Bishop Repudiates USCCB, Dems, Et al."
Post a Comment